91TV

Why did the Royal Society reject a 1932 scientific paper on the use of X-rays to stimulate the retina? Louisiane Ferlier investigates.

Archival material on papers deemed unsuitable for publication by the Royal Society is being made available for the first time, as Kiera Evans reports.

Peer Review Week’s 2024 theme of innovation and technology offers an opportunity to explore how the landscape of peer review rewards is evolving across the publishing industry to attract and retain talented reviewers, and to maintain the rigor of scientific discourse.

To celebrate Peer Review Week, we've added over 1,600 Referees' Reports to our Science in the Making platform, covering the period from 1949 to 1954.

Matt Hodgkinson, Research Integrity Manager at the UK Research Integrity Office, gives us an overview on how AI tools are shaping the future of publishing, and how reviewers, authors and publishers can adapt to thrive in this changing landscape.

The theme for this year's Peer Review Week is "Peer Review and the Future of Publishing". We speak with Denisse Albornoz, Science Policy adviser in the Royal Society’s Data team, about the policies that will likely evolve as AI technology continues to advance and its impact on scholarly publishing becomes more pronounced.

The focus for this year's Peer Review Week is 'Peer Review and the Future of Publishing'. In this blog post, Senior Publishing Editor, Andrew Dunn, reflects on some of the less traditional and more forward-looking models of publication and peer review that we support.

Anne McLaughlin finds wine experts, amateur magicians, chess masters and ichthyologists among the authors of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society.

Launched in 1665, Philosophical Transactions is the longest-running scientific journal in the world. Since then, a lot has changed in scientific publishing, but the Royal Society still strives to maintain integrity and trust in the research it publishes. 91TV Publishing Editorial team explains how.

In our commitment to support peer review, we're highlighting the different ways that we reward and recognise the vital contributions that our reviewers make to the publishing process.

To help recognise the vital contribution our reviewers make to the publishing process and to lower barriers to open access publication, Open Biology has introduced a reward scheme based on open access discounts starting January 2023.

This blog post highlights the steps we are taking to ensure our review process is inclusive, fair and transparent