91TV

We asked Open Biology reviewers to share their thoughts and experiences of co-review and its importance in making the process more accessible to the wider research community

Phil Hurst discusses the decision to collect gender data for Royal Society journals with the aim to identify and respond to potential biases in the peer review process.

For Peer Review Week 2020, we talk to Jana Christopher about her work in image integrity; a comprehensive service helping scientists and journals to protect and safeguard the published record.

91TV has been asking for expert advice on papers submitted for publication since the 1830s, and quality (or something like it) has always been one of the elements under consideration.

Professor David Hu, from Georgia Institute of Technology, tells us why the Journal of the Royal Society Interface is his preferred journal and why, when it comes to peer review, it’s not just what you know, but who you know.

Associate Editor of Open Biology, Dr Shirin Bahmanyar from Yale University, provides a snapshot of her journey as an academic researcher and her outlook on diversity in STEM.

A look at the Society’s efforts to ensure a diverse reviewer base.

Preprint and Associate Editor of Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Dr Maurine Neiman, from the University of Iowa, shared her thoughts on peer review and what makes a good review in scientific scholarly publishing.

A discussion of the history and benefits of transparency in peer review.